<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inner Party Democracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy</link>
	<description>Anti Corruption, Indian Politics, Social Activism, New Bihar</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 09:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: uvach</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>uvach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-729</guid>
		<description>@Sudhakaran - We all contribute in our own way owing to our own limitations. Appreciate the initiatives you have taken and my best wishes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Sudhakaran &#8211; We all contribute in our own way owing to our own limitations. Appreciate the initiatives you have taken and my best wishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudhakaran</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-726</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudhakaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 05:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-726</guid>
		<description>Inner party democracy is the natural rejuvenating force of democracy and the political parties. It’s Negation by the dynasties you mentioned and their caucuses in all parties and substituting it with the Consensus to expropriate positions of political power between themselves and their lackeys is the gravest curse of our Political system.
It promotes Dynasties, lackey-ism and sycophancy in our political leadership. 
Such vicious leadership cause wide spread corruption and moral decay among the masses.

But just writing in such forms would not cure this AIDS like curse...
We have to do something…
I am fighting against this manipulation by the Consensus and nomination and to bring in inner party democracy in to our political parties.

How many of you would be in a position to contribute in any way to this struggle  
Those interested may please join the group link given bellow...  group dedicated to debate, propagate and organize such a struggle to get inner party democracy in our political parties to rejuvenate them with competent men of integrity and character in their leadership 
C. K. Sudhakaran
Web: http://www.greatindiatrust.org/ , Mail: sudhakaranck@gmail.com 
Join our Yahoogroup: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OurGreatIndia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inner party democracy is the natural rejuvenating force of democracy and the political parties. It’s Negation by the dynasties you mentioned and their caucuses in all parties and substituting it with the Consensus to expropriate positions of political power between themselves and their lackeys is the gravest curse of our Political system.<br />
It promotes Dynasties, lackey-ism and sycophancy in our political leadership.<br />
Such vicious leadership cause wide spread corruption and moral decay among the masses.</p>
<p>But just writing in such forms would not cure this AIDS like curse&#8230;<br />
We have to do something…<br />
I am fighting against this manipulation by the Consensus and nomination and to bring in inner party democracy in to our political parties.</p>
<p>How many of you would be in a position to contribute in any way to this struggle<br />
Those interested may please join the group link given bellow&#8230;  group dedicated to debate, propagate and organize such a struggle to get inner party democracy in our political parties to rejuvenate them with competent men of integrity and character in their leadership<br />
C. K. Sudhakaran<br />
Web: <a href="http://www.greatindiatrust.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.greatindiatrust.org/</a> , Mail: <a href="mailto:sudhakaranck@gmail.com">sudhakaranck@gmail.com</a><br />
Join our Yahoogroup: <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OurGreatIndia" rel="nofollow">http://groups.yahoo.com/group/OurGreatIndia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danendra jain</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>danendra jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-216</guid>
		<description>It is always advisable that office bearers of an organization are changed periodically in a democratic system. At least there should be change of person every two or three years for the post of Secretary and the President in the same way as Branch head or Regional head or Zonal head or CEO of a bank is changed every two – three years. 

In a democratic country like India every political parties have been changing their Presidents periodically. Prominent Communist parties change their party president every two years. Banking Industry has inherited communist culture, but it is disheartening to mention here that  staff unions and associations in these banks are dependent on a few leaders who have been occupying top posts for decades.   Political parties, trust or an organization or Bank union or association of officers who consider any person indispensable on top posts are really too weak to survive for long and undoubtedly prone to corrupt practices. These organizations in fact have not developed second line of management.  

Danendra Jain
Ganaraj Choumuhani
Agartala
7th January 2009</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is always advisable that office bearers of an organization are changed periodically in a democratic system. At least there should be change of person every two or three years for the post of Secretary and the President in the same way as Branch head or Regional head or Zonal head or CEO of a bank is changed every two – three years. </p>
<p>In a democratic country like India every political parties have been changing their Presidents periodically. Prominent Communist parties change their party president every two years. Banking Industry has inherited communist culture, but it is disheartening to mention here that  staff unions and associations in these banks are dependent on a few leaders who have been occupying top posts for decades.   Political parties, trust or an organization or Bank union or association of officers who consider any person indispensable on top posts are really too weak to survive for long and undoubtedly prone to corrupt practices. These organizations in fact have not developed second line of management.  </p>
<p>Danendra Jain<br />
Ganaraj Choumuhani<br />
Agartala<br />
7th January 2009</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Election Reforms &#124; Corruption Free India &#124; Indian Politics &#124; Social Activism &#124; New Bihar</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Election Reforms &#124; Corruption Free India &#124; Indian Politics &#124; Social Activism &#124; New Bihar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-141</guid>
		<description>[...] the first part of the three part series on Next Generation Electoral Reforms (other two &#8211;   Inner Party Democracy , MP &#8211; M for Muder, P for Politcs ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the first part of the three part series on Next Generation Electoral Reforms (other two &#8211;   Inner Party Democracy , MP &#8211; M for Muder, P for Politcs ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danendra jain</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>danendra jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-93</guid>
		<description>We have heard a lot about reformation, privatization, liberalization and globalization. We have also heard a lot about stable GDP growth in India despite economic slowdown elsewhere in the world. Our politicians speak without any hesitation that India is decoupled with global recession. But the fruits of reformation so much lauded by Netas are available only to handful of rich persons. Large section of population still starve and unable to earn livelihood even for survival. 

In a country where millions really starve and where a few lac of rich and affluent person live luxuriously, we cannot dream of success of any reformation policy and we cannot imagine of persistent and all pervasive development .There is no doubt that the gap between the rich and the poor will widen .It is undoubtedly correct to say that standard of living of common men is moving from bad to worst and that of rich is going up from best to the best of the best in the world. Resultant consequence of such misrule and mismanagement will be nothing but escalation in unhappiness, disturbance in low and order situation and finally erosion in social peace. Might is right will prove to be true as the time passes away. Ultimately people revolt like that of 1857 will change the structure of governance from capitalistic to socialistic. 

Danendra jain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have heard a lot about reformation, privatization, liberalization and globalization. We have also heard a lot about stable GDP growth in India despite economic slowdown elsewhere in the world. Our politicians speak without any hesitation that India is decoupled with global recession. But the fruits of reformation so much lauded by Netas are available only to handful of rich persons. Large section of population still starve and unable to earn livelihood even for survival. </p>
<p>In a country where millions really starve and where a few lac of rich and affluent person live luxuriously, we cannot dream of success of any reformation policy and we cannot imagine of persistent and all pervasive development .There is no doubt that the gap between the rich and the poor will widen .It is undoubtedly correct to say that standard of living of common men is moving from bad to worst and that of rich is going up from best to the best of the best in the world. Resultant consequence of such misrule and mismanagement will be nothing but escalation in unhappiness, disturbance in low and order situation and finally erosion in social peace. Might is right will prove to be true as the time passes away. Ultimately people revolt like that of 1857 will change the structure of governance from capitalistic to socialistic. </p>
<p>Danendra jain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ravi bandhu</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>ravi bandhu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-85</guid>
		<description>It is a well thought out assessment of indian political parties parties.Pl. allow me to add few points of mine
1As a result of antidefection law,parliamentry debates have been reduced to colege debating society. Emphasis is on showing a closed mind party line and not an exchange of ideas to arrive at a meaningful conclusion. This was quite evident during no confidence motion against upa govt.Govt was asking for a vote of conscience but denying the same right to its own members.Division, display of notes in hall and later h00ldum against dissenters all exhibit undemocratic nature of all political parties
2 I would like you to have a look at my blog NIRBAL&#039;S
   CORNER&#039;  and apprise me with your reaction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a well thought out assessment of indian political parties parties.Pl. allow me to add few points of mine<br />
1As a result of antidefection law,parliamentry debates have been reduced to colege debating society. Emphasis is on showing a closed mind party line and not an exchange of ideas to arrive at a meaningful conclusion. This was quite evident during no confidence motion against upa govt.Govt was asking for a vote of conscience but denying the same right to its own members.Division, display of notes in hall and later h00ldum against dissenters all exhibit undemocratic nature of all political parties<br />
2 I would like you to have a look at my blog NIRBAL&#8217;S<br />
   CORNER&#8217;  and apprise me with your reaction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Election Reforms &#124; Corruption Free India &#124; Indian Politics &#124; Social Activism &#124; New Bihar -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.nobribe.org/inner-party-democracy/comment-page-1#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Election Reforms &#124; Corruption Free India &#124; Indian Politics &#124; Social Activism &#124; New Bihar -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 07:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobribe.org/?p=140#comment-84</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sanjay Uvach. Sanjay Uvach said: @vikramchandra @PritishNandy @BDUTT @kamla New Job Post:Charter for NextGen Election Reforms - Inner Party Democracy - http://is.gd/3GgLV [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sanjay Uvach. Sanjay Uvach said: @vikramchandra @PritishNandy @BDUTT @kamla New Job Post:Charter for NextGen Election Reforms &#8211; Inner Party Democracy &#8211; <a href="http://is.gd/3GgLV" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/3GgLV</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
